"It has already been proven." Clearly you and I have a different standard of proof.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is anyone willing here to bet me $$$ that the eCat will not be proven this >> year? >> > > It has already been proven. The best proof is this absurd paper > by Ericsson & Pomp. This is the best effort by skeptics to disprove the > paper and it utterly fails. Such weak arguments are tantamount to admitting > they have no case. > > This paper resembles Morrison's best attempt to disprove Fleischmann, > which was so bad it proved beyond any doubt Morrison was completely wrong. > See: > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmanreplytothe.pdf > > The only bet would be: > > Will blaze spinnaker / Mary Yugo / Göran Ericsson, Stephan Pomp believe > the data, or will they continue to spin absurd excuses to ignore it? > > I would bet that they will continue to spin excuses. > > The only way they will stop spinning excuses will be if the establishment > agrees that Rossi's device is real. I mean the entire establishment, > including the DoE and the New York Times. Not just ELFORSK. That is highly > unlikely. > > I do not actually bet money. It is against my principles. I have devoted a > large part of my life to this business so I do not think I need to > establish my sincerity by betting. Or my bona fides. > > If Mr. Spinnaker would like to prove he is serious, he will address the > technical issue about the model, raised here by Alan Fletcher. > > - Jed > >
