And by cold fusion, obviously I don't mean random small amounts of AHE. I mean what eCat / Rossi has done and some absurdly high COP.
I fully believe in the random AHE and LENR. That has been replicated many times. But to imagine that there is some new magical power source discovered by a convict that will alter trillions of dollars in investments and derivatives and global geopolitical power structures that everyone is completely ignoring? Possible sure, but improbable. On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:48 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > Jed, you are a bonafide crank. You and Mary Yugo should get together. > > A clear ambiguity exists when it comes to cold fusion and whether or not > it's true. If you can't see that, you're blind. > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> blaze spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> "It has already been proven." >>> >>> Clearly you and I have a different standard of proof. >>> >> >> Yes. I look at physics and engineering for objective, replicated >> evidence. You make a bet that ignorant, foolish people will not change >> their minds about something they know nothing about and have no business >> discussing, never mind judging. These are two completely different things. >> >> If this were 1906 you would be safe betting that the Sci. Am. and the New >> York Times will attack aviation and declare the Wright brothers frauds. The >> thing is, in 1906 that only proved those were ignorant fools making >> mistakes. It had no bearing on the reality of aviation. You can probably >> find a 100,000 pundits and scientists in the U.S. who will denounce cold >> fusion. One reading from an IR camera proves they are wrong. The best >> "arguments" they come up with will be the kind of stream-of-consciousness >> free form blather that Ericsson & Pomp presented. And that you will not >> address. >> >> There is nothing to bet on here. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
