Jed, you are a bonafide crank. You and Mary Yugo should get together. A clear ambiguity exists when it comes to cold fusion and whether or not it's true. If you can't see that, you're blind.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "It has already been proven." >> >> Clearly you and I have a different standard of proof. >> > > Yes. I look at physics and engineering for objective, replicated evidence. > You make a bet that ignorant, foolish people will not change their minds > about something they know nothing about and have no business discussing, > never mind judging. These are two completely different things. > > If this were 1906 you would be safe betting that the Sci. Am. and the New > York Times will attack aviation and declare the Wright brothers frauds. The > thing is, in 1906 that only proved those were ignorant fools making > mistakes. It had no bearing on the reality of aviation. You can probably > find a 100,000 pundits and scientists in the U.S. who will denounce cold > fusion. One reading from an IR camera proves they are wrong. The best > "arguments" they come up with will be the kind of stream-of-consciousness > free form blather that Ericsson & Pomp presented. And that you will not > address. > > There is nothing to bet on here. > > - Jed > >
