"If this were a real concern then science fiction should be banned."
Sorry, did you just say Rossi is like Science Fiction? Sure, if we all like to view him as such, I agree with your point. I think you may find that's not what people are saying here, however. Anyways, there's a clear reason why (most, ahem) main stream media outlets do not report on Rossi, and it isn't a conspiracy to oppress him and his 'discoveries'. It's a concern about how disruptive such reporting would be and the blowback they need to deal with if it turns out to be fraud. On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: > While this whole argument has become somewhat ridiculous the assertion > that "... to idly discuss these claims without proper verification is > very careless" because of some theoretical economic impact has got to be > the most ridiculous so far. If this were a real concern then science > fiction should be banned. > > [m] > > On Saturday, June 29, 2013, blaze spinnaker wrote: > >> Because the implications, if the AHE report is accurate, are >> overwhelming. And while it will be net positive, there will be massive >> creative destruction that will occur if the eCat is real. For example, in >> my province alone huge political spending programs on education and social >> welfare are being made on the promise of future tax and royalty earnings >> over the next decade from our natural gas production (ng which is mostly >> used for heating). >> >> If those revenues are about to be disrupted, this has huge implications >> on our province and how we plan our infrastructure spending. 10+ Billion >> dollar loans and guarantees are being made based on our current plans. >> Those 10s of billions of tax dollars could potentially be wasted. >> >> That's just one tiny example that I have specific experience with. >> Survey things on a more global basis and you'll see thousands of similar >> examples worldwide. >> >> So to idly discuss these claims without proper verification is very >> careless. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> *From: *Edmund Storms <[email protected]> >> *Date: *June 29, 2013 8:30:35 AM MDT >> *To: *Eric <[email protected]> >> *Cc: *Edmund Storms <[email protected]> >> *Subject: **Re: [Vo]:Could Rossi add DC Power to AC Lines?* >> >> Thanks Eric! Another voice of reality and reason is heard. I agree with >> your analysis. Ross not only does not have the ability to create the >> claimed fraud, but also he does not have the incentive to create one that >> would be so easy to discover. He has a method that produces anomalous >> energy, as has been demonstrated to be possible by numerous studies. He >> has spent his own money trying to get a device to market. The device has >> been examined by competent people, but perhaps not as perfectly as anyone >> would want. Nevertheless, enough to satisfy investors, which is the only >> people who matter at this stage. >> >> The skeptics are clearly irrational on several levels. As Jones said, if >> Rossi is right, he will greatly help mankind. If Rossi is wrong, only his >> investors will be hurt. So why would any rational person work to find fault >> in what he is doing if they are not potential investors? Do these people >> not have a life they can use to actually make a contribution to society? >> Are examples of REAL fraud that has clearly harmed everyone not enough to >> get their interest? >> >> Ed >> >> On Jun 29, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Eric wrote: >> >> >> So I read this board all the time but have not posted as you guys are >> usually smarter than I am. >> >> However, I am an Electrical Engineer working with many other Electrical >> Engineers and the question of how easy would it be to add DC power to the >> AC lines was interesting enough that we discussed it. >> >> Here is our conclusion: >> >> Could it be done - Yes >> >> However it would be somewhat tricky and there would be at least one trick >> needed to hide it from the power analyzer. >> >> The simplest way would be the add a DC source in the neutral leg of the >> three phase before it exited the wall socket, better right at the three >> phase transformer. >> >> This would cause a DC current to flow in all phases that are connected. >> Since the third phase does not appear to be connected that would be two >> phases. >> >> The DC supply would be in series with the three phase AC so it would need >> to allow the AC to flow through it's output stage without trying the >> regulate the AC or overheating. This would not be any DC supply we are >> aware of except maybe a >> >>
