While this whole argument has become somewhat ridiculous the assertion that "... to idly discuss these claims without proper verification is very careless" because of some theoretical economic impact has got to be the most ridiculous so far. If this were a real concern then science fiction should be banned.
[m] On Saturday, June 29, 2013, blaze spinnaker wrote: > Because the implications, if the AHE report is accurate, are overwhelming. > And while it will be net positive, there will be massive creative > destruction that will occur if the eCat is real. For example, in my > province alone huge political spending programs on education and social > welfare are being made on the promise of future tax and royalty earnings > over the next decade from our natural gas production (ng which is mostly > used for heating). > > If those revenues are about to be disrupted, this has huge implications on > our province and how we plan our infrastructure spending. 10+ Billion > dollar loans and guarantees are being made based on our current plans. > Those 10s of billions of tax dollars could potentially be wasted. > > That's just one tiny example that I have specific experience with. > Survey things on a more global basis and you'll see thousands of similar > examples worldwide. > > So to idly discuss these claims without proper verification is very > careless. > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *Edmund Storms <[email protected]> > *Date: *June 29, 2013 8:30:35 AM MDT > *To: *Eric <[email protected]> > *Cc: *Edmund Storms <[email protected]> > *Subject: **Re: [Vo]:Could Rossi add DC Power to AC Lines?* > > Thanks Eric! Another voice of reality and reason is heard. I agree with > your analysis. Ross not only does not have the ability to create the > claimed fraud, but also he does not have the incentive to create one that > would be so easy to discover. He has a method that produces anomalous > energy, as has been demonstrated to be possible by numerous studies. He > has spent his own money trying to get a device to market. The device has > been examined by competent people, but perhaps not as perfectly as anyone > would want. Nevertheless, enough to satisfy investors, which is the only > people who matter at this stage. > > The skeptics are clearly irrational on several levels. As Jones said, if > Rossi is right, he will greatly help mankind. If Rossi is wrong, only his > investors will be hurt. So why would any rational person work to find fault > in what he is doing if they are not potential investors? Do these people > not have a life they can use to actually make a contribution to society? > Are examples of REAL fraud that has clearly harmed everyone not enough to > get their interest? > > Ed > > On Jun 29, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Eric wrote: > > > So I read this board all the time but have not posted as you guys are > usually smarter than I am. > > However, I am an Electrical Engineer working with many other Electrical > Engineers and the question of how easy would it be to add DC power to the > AC lines was interesting enough that we discussed it. > > Here is our conclusion: > > Could it be done - Yes > > However it would be somewhat tricky and there would be at least one trick > needed to hide it from the power analyzer. > > The simplest way would be the add a DC source in the neutral leg of the > three phase before it exited the wall socket, better right at the three > phase transformer. > > This would cause a DC current to flow in all phases that are connected. > Since the third phase does not appear to be connected that would be two > phases. > > The DC supply would be in series with the three phase AC so it would need > to allow the AC to flow through it's output stage without trying the > regulate the AC or overheating. This would not be any DC supply we are > aware of except maybe a > >
