John H stated that these DGT device magnetic fields will cause disruptions to nearby equipment in the demo introduction on Tuesday.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, where did you see reference to the DGT device magnetic > fields causing disruptions to nearby equipment? That would be extremely > important if true. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 1:25 am > Subject: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) > > Brad Lowe: It was reported that the nickel isotopes all react, except > that Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) > > The LENR story is turning out to be a puzzle with many parts. The most > obscure piece of this puzzle is the shape and character of the EMF that > forms in the “Hot Spot” when nanoantennas concentrate photons through > “dark mode” resonance formation. > > > This resonance formation process packs huge vortex currents together in a > nano-scopic volume. One possible formation that this ball of charged light > can assume is the anapole ring which resembles the plasmoid. > > Today, Defkalion stated that the reactor packs huge magnetic fields > capable of disrupting all electronic equipment in the general vicinity of > the reactor core. The core had to be shielded by a double ply faraday cage. > That huge field is produced by nano-particles in a bath of infrared > radiation. > > This type and strength of magnetism is important in the nucleus of an > atom. These nuclei also pack huge magnetic fields. These fields are greatly > effected by Parity non conservation (PNC) effects. > > For the nuclei with an unpaired neutron the Parity non conservation (PNC) > effects may be strongly suppressed! This is true for odd numbered nucleons. > The nuclear magnetic field is not symmetrical; it is unbalanced like a top > with a weight glued to its outer edge. > > What is PCN? Here is some background info > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHp-ocXIs1U > > Parity Non-Conservation in the Weak Interaction > > Defkalion states as follows: “We realized also that Ni58, Ni60, Ni62 and > Ni64 stable isotopes where “willing” to participate in a LENR reaction, > while Ni61 was not.” > > In general, we know that the isotopes with an odd number of nucleons do > not react under LENR; only the ones with even number of nucleons do. > > This means that there is a nuclear configuration component that is > important in the LENR process. How the quarks are paired makes a difference > in LENR. > > > Parity non conservation (PCN) may be a determining factor in the LENR > reaction involving anapole magnetic effects. > > If it were simply a matter of shear EMF disruptive power, the > configuration of the nucleons in the nucleus would not be important. > > If it were simply a matter of charge concentration, PCN would not be > important. This charge concentration is what Dr, Kim and Defkalion think is > at the center of the even isotope mystery. > > But it is a strong anapole single polled magnetic field that could change > the handedness of some subatomic particles resulting in a disruptive > nuclear reaction. Higgs superconductivity is not easy to disrupt but when > it is disrupted, the quarks are all rearranged because of it. > > By the way, when nickel get to 137C, its magnetic field breaks into spin > ice of rotating vortex magnetic fields. Every bit of anapole magnetic power > helps disrupt that even nucleus. > >
