Near fields behave quite a bit differently than far fields. You can have a near field with a magnetic component that is far higher than that of a standard electromagnetic radiation condition. This seemed strange when I first encountered it, but made a lot of sense after looking into the issue. The same is true of electrical fields that resemble static conditions. I believe that the situation is treated as a field impedance behavior. Far fields all have the proper relationship of E and H vector ratios, but not near ones.
I have worked on devices that intentionally generated large time changing magnetic fields for their operation and likewise others that used large electric fields. Each has its own special characteristics which can be used when required. I vividly recall instances when new engineers who studied fields in college had a hard time accepting the fact that the ratios of the two vectors can vary in near field conditions. Since it is possible to enhance the near field magnetic component while suppressing the electric field, I sometimes refer to such a source as being a magnetic field even though it is time changing to emphasize the difference between it and a far field wave. Dave -----Original Message----- From: James Bowery <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 11:59 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) It doesn't make sense to call them "magnetic" rather than "electromagnetic" fields if the variation in the magnetic field is rapid. Moreover, a mere magnetic field is not going to disrupt electronics in general -- its EM fields that do that. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Teslaalset <[email protected]> wrote: The magnetic fields may be very high frequent which will cause eddy currents in the shielding plates, creating counter magnetic fields, resulting in strongly reduced magnetic interference. In that sence shielding will work. Op woensdag 24 juli 2013 schreef David Roberson ([email protected]) het volgende: Good point Eric. But keep in mind that a Faraday shield would not stop a magnetic field. They can eliminate electrostatic fields, but not magnetic ones unless the field is at a very high frequency. This is an important piece of the puzzle if true. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 1:45 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: Today, Defkalion stated that the reactor packs huge magnetic fields capable of disrupting all electronic equipment in the general vicinity of the reactor core. The core had to be shielded by a double ply faraday cage. That huge field is produced by nano-particles in a bath of infrared radiation. This makes it sound like there is a current of some kind. If so, that is a point in favor of energetic particles (coherent groups, perhaps) and a point against slow deuterium/helium formation, which, presumably, would not produce currents (unless I'm misunderstanding an implication). Eric
