Point taken about the Faraday cage (I have not heard the original reference, so I am going on hearsay).
After I thought about it, I suspect any shielding would be for low-level x-ray and gamma radiation rather than to protect electronics. Eric On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:19, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Good point Eric. But keep in mind that a Faraday shield would not stop a > magnetic field. They can eliminate electrostatic fields, but not magnetic > ones unless the field is at a very high frequency. This is an important > piece of the puzzle if true. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 1:45 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> Today, Defkalion stated that the reactor packs huge magnetic fields capable >> of disrupting all electronic equipment in the general vicinity of the >> reactor core. The core had to be shielded by a double ply faraday cage. That >> huge field is produced by nano-particles in a bath of infrared radiation. > > This makes it sound like there is a current of some kind. If so, that is a > point in favor of energetic particles (coherent groups, perhaps) and a point > against slow deuterium/helium formation, which, presumably, would not produce > currents (unless I'm misunderstanding an implication). > > Eric >
