The grounded thick stainless steel container, mu metal, and outer metal insulated box should act as a cage for the Defkalion demo. I expect there was EMI from their HV supply D2
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) From: [email protected] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:54:32 -0700 To: [email protected] Point taken about the Faraday cage (I have not heard the original reference, so I am going on hearsay). After I thought about it, I suspect any shielding would be for low-level x-ray and gamma radiation rather than to protect electronics. Eric On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:19, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: Good point Eric. But keep in mind that a Faraday shield would not stop a magnetic field. They can eliminate electrostatic fields, but not magnetic ones unless the field is at a very high frequency. This is an important piece of the puzzle if true. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 1:45 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: Today, Defkalion stated that the reactor packs huge magnetic fields capable of disrupting all electronic equipment in the general vicinity of the reactor core. The core had to be shielded by a double ply faraday cage. That huge field is produced by nano-particles in a bath of infrared radiation. This makes it sound like there is a current of some kind. If so, that is a point in favor of energetic particles (coherent groups, perhaps) and a point against slow deuterium/helium formation, which, presumably, would not produce currents (unless I'm misunderstanding an implication). Eric
