The plasma control technique used by DGT appears to be quite a bit different than what Rossi is doing with his device. We should all be excited to find that there are several different techniques that yield excess heat.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, Jul 24, 2013 12:39 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] >Brad Lowe: It was reported that the nickel isotopes all react, except that >Ni 61 does not react. (Ideas why this would be?) 61Ni is the only naturally occurring NI isotope with odd spin (and hence a nuclear magnetic moment). The more logical explanation is that that DGT is trying to distance themselves from the Claims of Rossi patent application, in the event it will be granted. If you accept the validity of the DGT demo, and it looks damn good to me despite a few problems, then Rossi's demo should be accepted also, and the Patent Law under section 713.98 permits the demonstration of a working device. So we pretty much have to assume that the Rossi IP will be granted eventually - since he can actually demonstrate the effect. We know that he has claimed that Ni-62 is the active isotope and if true, it would keep DGT out of the game. Anyway - it is extremely doubtful, given the expense of pure isotopes and Defkalion's lack of capital, that they have done the correct testing to back such a self-serving statement. Rossi has been much better funded. Therefore DGT has every incentive, in seeking investors - to insert that kind of comment about not having the same technology as Rossi, even if untrue. They cannot afford to be seen as having copied Rossi's technology - when his patent is eventually granted; but everyone on this forum knows the history going back a few years; and that DGT actually admitted to copying the formula at the University of Sienna. IOW - If they - DGT are to attract sufficient outside funding, and they badly need it - then they essentially "have to" invent something like this story to overcome due diligence objections. In spite of the successful demo, the statement about isotope activity from DGT is almost certainly self-serving and bogus. Jones
