(Which is what I'm trying to predict. I am not trying to predict whether it's possible to quantum tunnel through the Coulomb barrier)
at should be restated as "disrupt the Higgs superconductivity." On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:36 PM, blaze spinnaker <[email protected]>wrote: > > To give another dramatic example, suppose at 1:00 pm on the afternoon of > > December 17, 1903, you were take a poll about whether man can fly. > > What does that have to do with the value of prediction markets? > > And, btw if that's the analogy, are you saying we haven't learned to > do LENR+ yet? That we are at the equivalent of December 17, 1903? > > I thought you believed that Rossi had figured this out years ago. > > (Which is what I'm trying to predict. I am not trying to predict > whether it's possible to quantum tunnel through the Coulomb barrier) > >
