How much does it cost to get the NI demo device duplicated?
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, DJ Cravens <djcrav...@hotmail.com> wrote: > E vs. temp was not done at the demo. > However below are some typical (average) values from some old lab runs. > I did not "calibrate" at the demo. I only showed that the sample was > warmer than the control. That was the only point that was attempted there > so there was no claim of amount of energy but it was around 4 watts. I > did not want to confuse things and there was no time to calibrate. Just > one sphere was hotter than its environment- that was it. > > The important point is that excess increases with temperature. > You may want wait till the next issue of IE comes out to see some > empirical models (Letts, in #112) for better data. Letts has fitted > hundreds of data sets. > > temp C excess W 292 0.2 312 0.6 332 1.2 352 3.9 372 6.2 > 397 7.1 > > ------------------------------ > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo > From: dlrober...@aol.com > Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:00:27 -0400 > > > It is not clear how any form of energy gain is associated with this > experiment. The demonstration appears to generate LENR energy, but the > input function is not present. It would be educational to have a plot of > energy generation versus temperature. > > Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 3:53 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > > Jed Rothwell wrote: > > http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf > > >> Such a simple, magnificent demonstration. "Can you make me a charger > for my Tesla car?" Charming. > > Indeed it is - and understated since the hot sphere transfers heat to the > bed and to the control - so the actual gain is more than it appears. > > ... hey, Terry - are you the proud owner of a Tesla (or just wishing you > were)? > > > >
