Arent the temperatures below in K instead °C? Im pretty sure the water bath wasnt at 397°C neither 292°C
_____ From: DJ Cravens [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vendredi 20 septembre 2013 23:14 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo E vs. temp was not done at the demo. However below are some typical (average) values from some old lab runs. I did not "calibrate" at the demo. I only showed that the sample was warmer than the control. That was the only point that was attempted there so there was no claim of amount of energy but it was around 4 watts. I did not want to confuse things and there was no time to calibrate. Just one sphere was hotter than its environment- that was it. The important point is that excess increases with temperature. You may want wait till the next issue of IE comes out to see some empirical models (Letts, in #112) for better data. Letts has fitted hundreds of data sets. temp C excess W 292 0.2 312 0.6 332 1.2 352 3.9 372 6.2 397 7.1 _____ To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo From: [email protected] Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:00:27 -0400 It is not clear how any form of energy gain is associated with this experiment. The demonstration appears to generate LENR energy, but the input function is not present. It would be educational to have a plot of energy generation versus temperature. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Sep 20, 2013 3:53 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cravens report on NI Week demo -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton Jed Rothwell wrote: > http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf >> Such a simple, magnificent demonstration. "Can you make me a charger for my Tesla car?" Charming. Indeed it is - and understated since the hot sphere transfers heat to the bed and to the control - so the actual gain is more than it appears. ... hey, Terry - are you the proud owner of a Tesla (or just wishing you were)?
