>
> Peter, Dr. Hadjichristos,
>
Thank you for your efforts. Few questions/observations after reading the
paper that perhaps you can take a moment to comment on:
1) Magnetic fields (caused by ion migration) trap excited Rydberg state
hydrogen. Therefore the NAE are these localized "trap" zones on the surface
of Ni particles. So is the evolving ("breathing") Ni lattice site
NAE outlined in the ICCF-17 paper no longer applicable/postulated? Or do
these NAE's coexist in your model?
2) Were the doubts/objections raised about the Tesla fields (in both this
forum and elsewhere) considered before drafting the paper (and therefore
double checked), or not considered important and drafted despite them? Have
those objections been put to rest as far as you are concerned or is there
more measurement work to be done?
3) The absence of gammas now seems to be ascribed to momentum
distribution/diffusion throughout the boson cluster. So DGT has abandoned
the heavy electron shield hypothesis stated in the ICCF-17 paper?
4) When will the real-time mass spectrometers be up and running? When do
you think relevant data will be made available? Will deuterium and helium
concentrations be the main products sought after?
5) Just an observation: Interesting to see you considering the effect of
deuterium impurities on the primary reaction. Glad to see investigation
into this possibility.
Thank you again and all the best.
Regards,
John M.
