The theoretic fecundity of Mr. Rose is enough to make MIT's patent lawyers weep as though Hagelstein walked through the door.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_charge > > I believe that this excess charge comes from the direct conversion of heat > (infrared light) into elections. > > > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Axil, >> >> Would you explain what you mean by the violation of conservation of >> charge since Rossi only excites the particles with heat? >> >> What if his device separates the charges by some method so that the >> electrons leave the now positively charged central region? I once figured >> a way to extract power from his device by having it eject energetic >> electrons (or positrons, etc.) from the core into an outer collector. >> These particles need to travel against an electric field as they loose >> kinetic energy. That converted kinetic energy can be extracted by allowing >> electrons to flow through a load back into the core. This appears to be a >> method of extracting a few watts of DC provided charged particles are >> emitted from the core and collected on an electrically insulated material. >> Of course it would be difficult for the particles to reach the collector >> unless energetic if they pass through most materials. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sat, Oct 26, 2013 11:01 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Seminal New Energy paper by Kim and Hadjichristos >> >> >> >> By the way, Rossi has reported lots of excess electrons coming off his >> reactor. This is an apparent violation of the conservation of charge since >> he uses only heat to excite the particle zoo. >> > >
