On Saturday, October 26, 2013 8:35:34 PM UTC-4, JohnMaguire wrote:
>
> Peter, Dr. Hadjichristos,
>>
>
> Thank you for your efforts. Few questions/observations after reading the
> paper that perhaps you can take a moment to comment on:
>
> 1) Magnetic fields (caused by ion migration) trap excited Rydberg state
> hydrogen. Therefore the NAE are these localized "trap" zones on the surface
> of Ni particles. So is the evolving ("breathing") Ni lattice site
> NAE outlined in the ICCF-17 paper no longer applicable/postulated? Or do
> these NAE's coexist in your model?
>
> 2) Were the doubts/objections raised about the Tesla fields (in both this
> forum and elsewhere) considered before drafting the paper (and therefore
> double checked), or not considered important and drafted despite them? Have
> those objections been put to rest as far as you are concerned or is there
> more measurement work to be done?
>
> 3) The absence of gammas now seems to be ascribed to momentum
> distribution/diffusion throughout the boson cluster. So DGT has abandoned
> the heavy electron shield hypothesis stated in the ICCF-17 paper?
>
> 4) When will the real-time mass spectrometers be up and running? When do
> you think relevant data will be made available?
>
> 5) Will deuterium and tritium concentrations be sought after at some point
> soon?
>
> 6) Just an observation: Interesting to see you considering the effect of
> deuterium impurities on the primary reaction. Glad to see investigation
> into this possibility.
>
> Thank you again and all the best.
>
> Regards,
> John M.
>
