http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_charge
I believe that this excess charge comes from the direct conversion of heat (infrared light) into elections. On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > > Would you explain what you mean by the violation of conservation of > charge since Rossi only excites the particles with heat? > > What if his device separates the charges by some method so that the > electrons leave the now positively charged central region? I once figured > a way to extract power from his device by having it eject energetic > electrons (or positrons, etc.) from the core into an outer collector. > These particles need to travel against an electric field as they loose > kinetic energy. That converted kinetic energy can be extracted by allowing > electrons to flow through a load back into the core. This appears to be a > method of extracting a few watts of DC provided charged particles are > emitted from the core and collected on an electrically insulated material. > Of course it would be difficult for the particles to reach the collector > unless energetic if they pass through most materials. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Oct 26, 2013 11:01 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Seminal New Energy paper by Kim and Hadjichristos > > > > By the way, Rossi has reported lots of excess electrons coming off his > reactor. This is an apparent violation of the conservation of charge since > he uses only heat to excite the particle zoo. >
