Hello Blazoe, I did not understand all you said. I do believe we have similar opinions. Hower, I believe you have the partners yo deserve. If gaming industry are interested then you know the chances are better than 60 to 70 %. Now, identify other people more seriious which can benefit from LENR. No, not governm0ent or institutions, they are only betting when they have 120% 100 as return on the paper and 20 in thepocket. Best Lennart Thornros On Jan 6, 2014 6:33 PM, "Blaze Spinnaker" <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fair points. > > Note that I am more mostly referring to Rossi and that LENR+ is currently > available in some secret lab somewhere. > > It's worth noting that much like most people here I generally believe in > LENR itself and I am fairly optimistic that LENR+ might be possible at some > point, even if in the distant future (60-70%). For example, perhaps it > will require a much more fine grained control over particles and > understanding of quantum tunneling to overcome the coulomb barrier. Or > something. This is all intuition/speculation of course. > > As for my estimates: > > I like STM as they're by far and away the most credible institution that > has gotten involved in LENR in a serious way. It's one thing for random > individuals to do things, but it's another for groups of people / managers > / public shareholder money to get thrown at this. > > The ARPA-E wasn't a big deal for me. It was one tiny box in a multitude > of boxes. If ARPA-E is a big deal, than LENR has bigger problems as I've > been working on the assumption that ARPA is just hostile to the whole > movement from reasons other than scientific. > > I don't see Duncan as a big deal, more of a failure from an individual > point of view. He bailed on LENR and the big donation, that really speaks > more about him than LENR itself. Maybe he did it for his wife. Who > knows. I was sad to see it though. > > > Cravens is great. He helps show that LENR is real. Toyota and friends > did some great stuff there as well. > > The Chinese thing is interesting and it was my biggest source of > excitement. But then I just read that Rossi has staffed his biz with > ex-gambling industry people. Yikes. > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> From: Blaze Spinnaker >> >> This is based on >> * STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >> * Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >> * Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >> * Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. >> Could be updating this probability more frequently. >> >> >> >> If so, then the ARPA-E inclusion of LENR for funding should add something >> positive, and the Defkalion departure from Canada should detract. >> >> Why give so much comparative credence to the STM patent application? First >> off, it was not a very good application in my estimation, and could be net >> neutral. Cravens patent stuff is more meaningful and important. The main >> plus is that a major company went to the trouble to file something. >> >> Robert Duncan moving from Missouri to Texas A&M could go either way, no? >> >> The Chinese connection could be assessed much higher. >> >> >> >> >> >
