I've worked with Gambling Industry people. It has never ended well. Hopefully it's not the case with Rossi.
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello Blazoe, I did not understand all you said. I do believe we have > similar opinions. Hower, I believe you have the partners yo deserve. > If gaming industry are interested then you know the chances are better > than 60 to 70 %. Now, identify other people more seriious which can benefit > from LENR. No, not governm0ent or institutions, they are only betting when > they have 120% 100 as return on the paper and 20 in thepocket. > Best > Lennart Thornros > On Jan 6, 2014 6:33 PM, "Blaze Spinnaker" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Fair points. >> >> Note that I am more mostly referring to Rossi and that LENR+ is currently >> available in some secret lab somewhere. >> >> It's worth noting that much like most people here I generally believe in >> LENR itself and I am fairly optimistic that LENR+ might be possible at some >> point, even if in the distant future (60-70%). For example, perhaps it >> will require a much more fine grained control over particles and >> understanding of quantum tunneling to overcome the coulomb barrier. Or >> something. This is all intuition/speculation of course. >> >> As for my estimates: >> >> I like STM as they're by far and away the most credible institution that >> has gotten involved in LENR in a serious way. It's one thing for random >> individuals to do things, but it's another for groups of people / managers >> / public shareholder money to get thrown at this. >> >> The ARPA-E wasn't a big deal for me. It was one tiny box in a multitude >> of boxes. If ARPA-E is a big deal, than LENR has bigger problems as I've >> been working on the assumption that ARPA is just hostile to the whole >> movement from reasons other than scientific. >> >> I don't see Duncan as a big deal, more of a failure from an individual >> point of view. He bailed on LENR and the big donation, that really speaks >> more about him than LENR itself. Maybe he did it for his wife. Who >> knows. I was sad to see it though. >> >> >> Cravens is great. He helps show that LENR is real. Toyota and friends >> did some great stuff there as well. >> >> The Chinese thing is interesting and it was my biggest source of >> excitement. But then I just read that Rossi has staffed his biz with >> ex-gambling industry people. Yikes. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> From: Blaze Spinnaker >>> >>> This is based on >>> * STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>> * Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>> * Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>> * Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. >>> Could be updating this probability more frequently. >>> >>> >>> >>> If so, then the ARPA-E inclusion of LENR for funding should add something >>> positive, and the Defkalion departure from Canada should detract. >>> >>> Why give so much comparative credence to the STM patent application? >>> First >>> off, it was not a very good application in my estimation, and could be >>> net >>> neutral. Cravens patent stuff is more meaningful and important. The main >>> plus is that a major company went to the trouble to file something. >>> >>> Robert Duncan moving from Missouri to Texas A&M could go either way, no? >>> >>> The Chinese connection could be assessed much higher. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
