Mike,

You say that hydrinos are dark matter.  What do you base this statement upon?  
I have long believed that dark matter and energy do not actually exist, but am 
open to ideas.  It seems that the scientific community comes up with concepts 
to explain everything except LENR by imagining possible solutions.  They may be 
correct about the dark duo, but it is important for them to show some firm 
proof, which is lacking.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Carrell <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, Jan 18, 2014 2:34 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Understanding BLP



Eric, the point  is simply force people to get a license and pay royalty if 
they sell product. A patent is basically license to sue. Undefended, it is 
useless paper. Once BLP is able to produce a commercially viable device, 
entrepreneurs in many countries will attempt to copy it. BLP is very open about 
the technology, although *study* is required because it is very new. A copier 
may even achieve partial success, but not optimum performance without help. The 
investors deserve to be repaid many times over for their patience. I once 
worked for RCA, the source for compatible color television technology, now a 
world standard. Although the patents expired, RCA sold licenses to major 
Japanese companies  for technical assistance and access to RCA engineers.
 
Ideally, Mills would like a basic patent on hydrinos, but they exist in nature 
as “dark matter” and cannot be patented.
 
Mike Carrell
 

From: Eric Walker [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 11:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Understanding BLP

 


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote:

 

His patent disclosers are descriptive of many possible strategies and 
ingredients [to catch any copiers] while concealing in plain sight the optimum 
path which s disclosed to licensees.

 

Why would he intentionally make it hard for people to work out how to build the 
devices described in his patents?  My understanding is that if people skilled 
in the art cannot do it, he risks losing the patent.  If they can replicate and 
wish to use the procedure or device in something that they wish to sell, they 
must negotiate a license.

 

Eric

 



________________________________________________________________________
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. Department.


Reply via email to