Dear Mike, Just about the BLP's Demo of Jan 28, I want to mention that DGT has presented a 9+ hours demo at ICCF 18 and 2 days before it has officially published A PROTOCOL predicting the paameters and results they will obtain during the demo. See please: DEFKALION'S TEST PROTOCOL FOR PUBLIC DEMO
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/test-protocol-for-public-demo-test-code.html DEFKALION HAS KEPT ITS PROMISE http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/07/defkalion-has-kept-its-promise.html I think Randy could do the same thing, it demonstrates that he rules the situation and the device. Plus he can explain what he actually has achieved , both in power and in energy. Such a Protocol is necessary, I think. Peter On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:43 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > You say that hydrinos are dark matter. What do you base this statement > upon? I have long believed that dark matter and energy do not actually > exist, but am open to ideas. It seems that the scientific community comes > up with concepts to explain everything except LENR by imagining possible > solutions. They may be correct about the dark duo, but it is important for > them to show some firm proof, which is lacking. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Carrell <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sat, Jan 18, 2014 2:34 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Understanding BLP > > Eric, the point is simply force people to get a license and pay > royalty if they sell product. A patent is basically license to sue. > Undefended, it is useless paper. Once BLP is able to produce a commercially > viable device, entrepreneurs in many countries will attempt to copy it. BLP > is very open about the technology, although **study** is required because > it is very new. A copier may even achieve partial success, but not optimum > performance without help. The investors deserve to be repaid many times > over for their patience. I once worked for RCA, the source for compatible > color television technology, now a world standard. Although the patents > expired, RCA sold licenses to major Japanese companies for technical > assistance and access to RCA engineers. > > Ideally, Mills would like a basic patent on hydrinos, but they exist in > nature as “dark matter” and cannot be patented. > > Mike Carrell > > *From:* Eric Walker [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]?>] > > *Sent:* Friday, January 17, 2014 11:35 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Understanding BLP > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > His patent disclosers are descriptive of many possible strategies and > ingredients [to catch any copiers] while concealing in plain sight the > optimum path which s disclosed to licensees. > > > Why would he intentionally make it hard for people to work out how to > build the devices described in his patents? My understanding is that if > people skilled in the art cannot do it, he risks losing the patent. If > they can replicate and wish to use the procedure or device in something > that they wish to sell, they must negotiate a license. > > Eric > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department. > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
