I agree with you, Jones. The hydrino or something like it allows LENR
to occur. The only variation in the various theories comes from how
this special state functions. Mills focuses only on creation of the
state, not its role in LENR, as you note. He took this stand early
even though he saw and reported tritium production because he did not
want to get sucked in the rejection hole into which LENR had fallen.
The only information of value is the recipe used to make energy. This
recipe is guided by theory but the theory can not be patented so
people cannot be stopped from using it as a guide to find better
recipes. Mills and people in the LENR field all suffer from the same
problem. They are addicted to their theory. If the theory is close to
reality, they can make progress. However, most theories are not close
to reality.
Mills has a method that works up to a point. But, as you note as well,
his theory, although impressive, has prevented him from finding the
best recipe so far. Nevertheless, he has discovered some interesting
behavior, just as LENR has done. The race is on to find out how these
behaviors can be applied. I think LENR is ahead of the game because
the important behaviors have been made public, not hidden as Mills has
done. Rossi is ahead because he has applied these behaviors even
though he does not understand their meaning. In contrast, Mills claims
to understand the meaning, but is having a hard time finding an
effective application. Perhaps this time he has. Only time will tell.
When the smoke clears, I expect only one mechanism will be operating
in both energy generators.
Ed Storms
On Jan 20, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Mike Carrell
Alan , BLP belongs to the chemical world, LENR= Low Energy Nuclear
Reactions, a whole different world.
This clearly defined kind of bifurcation is what Randell Mills and
his financial backers would dearly love for you to believe. It can
mean billions to them in the end.
Mike could be correct on this or not, but it is imperative to state
all of the options. For many on the fence - BLP has not yet come
close to making a good case for that “chemical only” proposition.
I can almost guarantee that Mills device will produce the same low
levels of transmutation that are seen in LENR, and this is precisely
why he lets no one into that Lab without the strictest NDA you have
ever seen. It is his billion dollar secret and it is well-protected.
In fact, it is just as likely that BLP is indeed the using same
underlying modus operandi as LENR whether Mills likes it or not.
Even the most brilliant inventor does not get to dictate the science
and physics which make a device work or not. This will NOT be Mills
prerogative, in the end – brilliant as he is.
However, there is also a third view which has been voiced over the
years on Vortex - and it is the one which gets comparatively little
press because it pleases neither camp.
This is the view that the hydrino is a predecessor state or
condition which may produce a little excess energy on its own - but
it inevitably goes to LENR as the next step. IOW the hydrino is the
predecessor state to LENR.
It is worth repeating that this stance pleases almost no one in
either camp, and therefore to the contrarian – it must be correct J
Jones
