Eric, I was suspecting that the hydrinos might be diffusing out of the system so that a relatively large mass would appear missing. The small mass converted to energy expected by a true fusion reaction is so tiny that it is extremely difficult to measure. The chemical reaction nature of hydrino generation that subsequently escape would be much easier to detect at low sub levels than fusion events. I am having a difficult time expressing what I refer to.
It would be great if hydrinos could be captured in some vessel, but no one has reported having them around to measure as far as I know. That is my main point. Until some of these little guys are captured and tested I must remain skeptical. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Jan 19, 2014 10:08 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP's announcement On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:42 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: Can a loss of mass attributed to the formation of hydrinos and their subsequent escape from the system be shown? This would be strong evidence as well. I think the transition from hydrogen to hydrino would show up as an apparent violation of conservation of mass/energy. You would get the transfer of heat to the catalyst during the transition to a sub-ground state, and then the remaining particle would fall into the epistemological void, becoming a dark-matter like entity and disappearing from most kinds of detection. (I recall mention that hydrinos can be detected in spectrographic analysis; perhaps it is only the less shrunken ones that can.) I.e., it would look like some mass disappeared, and that an amount of energy that is not equivalent to the disappearing mass was all remained. It would look like mass-energy was lost from the system. I too am skeptical about dark matter, about hydrinos, and about hydrinos being dark matter. Eric
