Erik, conservation f energy applies. Mills understanding of the Resonant Transfer reaction has evolved over the years. I am sure it will support many PhD dissertations. Clue: it *does not involve radiation*. Using antenna theory, it is a *near field* interchange, not involving a photon. If you are still thinking a Bohr planetary model, give it up, it doesn’t work here. The orbitsphere model does. There is attraction between the orbiting negative charge and the positive proton. The catalyst extracts part of that energy and the orbit shrinks to rebalance. All of this you can find discussed in Vol. 1 of GUTCP, free download.
Mike Carrell From: Eric Walker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 10:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP's announcement On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:42 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: Can a loss of mass attributed to the formation of hydrinos and their subsequent escape from the system be shown? This would be strong evidence as well. I think the transition from hydrogen to hydrino would show up as an apparent violation of conservation of mass/energy. You would get the transfer of heat to the catalyst during the transition to a sub-ground state, and then the remaining particle would fall into the epistemological void, becoming a dark-matter like entity and disappearing from most kinds of detection. (I recall mention that hydrinos can be detected in spectrographic analysis; perhaps it is only the less shrunken ones that can.) I.e., it would look like some mass disappeared, and that an amount of energy that is not equivalent to the disappearing mass was all remained. It would look like mass-energy was lost from the system. I too am skeptical about dark matter, about hydrinos, and about hydrinos being dark matter. Eric ________________________________________________________________________ This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. Department.
