Cold fusion claims are at 1% to 3% at Idea Futures Exchange.Claim NiLENR - Nickel Hydrogen Nuclear EnergyCategory: *Science & Technology:Physics*bid 1, ask 3, last 2Owner:45, Baldrson (jim_bow...@hotmail.com)Judge:2, Chris Hibbert (c...@pancrit.org)created:2011/06/13due date:2015/01/01The Claim
Cold fusion of hydrogen in nickel can produce over 10 watts/cc net power. The phrase "cold fusion" has its vernacular meaning of any low energy nuclear reaction that produces heat. This claim is intended to be similar to the CFsn claim regarding deuterium in palladium but relaxing the requirement for STP since high pressure hydrogen gas loading and high temperature are purportedly required to sustain the hydrogen in nickel cold fusion reaction. http://ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=NiLENR Claim CFsn - Cold FusionCategory: *Science & Technology:Physics*bid 2, ask 3, last 2Owner:0, Bank (i...@ideosphere.com)Judge:306, SMWinnie ( smwin...@yahoo.com)created:1994/09/23due date:TBDThe Claim Cold fusion of deuterium in palladium can produce over 10 watts/cc. net power at STP (standard temperature and pressure). Cold fusion is discussed on the fusion newsgroup <news:sci.physics.fusion>. Judge's Statement Judgment will be entered on CFsn on or before January 1, 2015. I will judge based on the intent of this claim, if I perceive such intent to be obvious. If such intent is ambiguous I will judge on the basis of the precise wording. If both are ambiguous, I will look for a solution which follows IF/FX precedent insofar as such precedent is apparent to me and applicable to the claim. I will seek the guidance of the claim's owner/author in interpreting the claim. It's his or her question - s/he ought to get the answer sought. If I believe this claim to have met a YES or NO condition, and if I believe judgement will be controversial, I will post a prospective judgement to fx-discuss and forestall entering the judgement for a comment period to be announced in the post. http://ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=CFsn On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> This conversation is not like that because you are not a crowd of people. >> You are only one person, and no one else here is hazarding a guess. >> > > Oh, lots of people have hazard guesses. You don't know everything, Jed. > :) > >
