On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:47 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jeff Driscoll says: > > |smaller fractions than 1/137.0359 are not possible because electron > would be going faster than light > | > > Special Relativity explains the electron speed of light limit in a > somewhat reasonable manner. In that case the maximum speed is approached > as the limit to a continuously increasing value. There is no free travel > throughout all possible velocities until you hit a brick wall, but instead > an increasing resistance until that limit become unobtainable. I suspect > that Mills' theory is in error if he assumes a zero width transition. The > time dilation and length contraction effect must somehow find their ways > into his model and perhaps I misunderstand what he explains. Jeff, are you > aware of how it includes these issues? > yes it is in his model, read any of his papers or go to the streaming book: http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/book/book-download/ click on "stream volume 1" or maybe this link will work too: http://issuu.com/blacklightpower/docs/vol1?mode=embed&layout=http%3A//skin.issuu.com/v/color/layout.xml&backgroundColor=31558B&showFlipBtn=true > > If he eventually does include these two well supported phenomena, then the > 1/137.0359 fraction most likely will be changed to a new one. > it is a fully developed theory that can't be dismissed easily by quick speculation > Then, my hope for inclusion of all the integer and fractional values might > reappear as a consequence. > > Just seeking a better understanding of nature. No honest question should > be off limits. > > Dave > -- Jeff Driscoll 617-290-1998
