"No one ever wrote an equation that conserves magnetic flux."
In order to determine if something is conserved when it can be
transformed into different forms, you HAVE to be able to MEASURE how
much of EACH different form is present...
It only APPEARS as if mag-flux is not conserved...
The mag-field is the physical manifestation of a polarization of the
vacuum (ZPF or Zero Point Field), and we have no way to measure the
local amount of vacuum, so you can't tell whether its conserved or not.
-mark
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:58 PM, [email protected] wrote:
I don't know if anyone is now interested in this. Its old stuff. If
you watch Walter Lewin at MIT Academic Earth he says often the the
magnetic force is non-conservative.
Energy and momentum are conserved in equations. No one ever wrote an
equation that conserves magnetic flux. This just goes without saying.
I, however, say it loudly in my published works. The only things that
are not conserved are inertial mass and magnetic flux. They are related
as magnetic fields carries the inertial mass of moving stuff.
Electrical engineers employ soft iron to increase the magnetic force.
Soft iron increase the flux produced by a coil by a factor of about
10,000. I found the soft iron equivalent for the other forces. Its a
vibrating Bose condensate.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Zell <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 3:30 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR
What where did this emergent inductance come from? More magnetism
that came from nothing. I was upset, this would make the test harder.
Magnetism is not a conserved force. Somethings it springs out of
nowhere. This is a general property of all of the magnetic force s.
The above interests me but are there any specifics on this, especially
published papers?
