Terahertz stimulation is the photon frequency that produces the lowest resistive loss in plasmonic energy concentration using metal nanoparticles.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Frank.. > > Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of > antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] > > > > I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the > back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the > claims of Eugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the > environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk > magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I > think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational > effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will > soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved...like > we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently > these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor > placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down > the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as > opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas > becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present > additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or > catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector > and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial > bias. Fran > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation > for LENR > > > > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion > > theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity > 1,094,000 > > meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear > > Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. > > > > > > > > > > What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound > in the nucleus. > > > > > > What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the > electronic structure. > > > > Your get: > > > > The energy levels of all of the atoms. > > The intensity of spectral emission. > > The enegy and the frequency of the photon > > The S,P,D, and F orbits. > > A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. > > The deBroglie wave. > > > > extrapolate and get: > > > > The technology of antigravity > > and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. > > > > > > > > Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" > > > > > > > > Frank Znidarsic > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fznidarsic <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > "a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" > > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the > Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity > 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of > the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. > > > > > > http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 > > > > Frank Znidarsic > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am > Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > > > > > *From:* Ron Kita > > > > I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but > > I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell > > citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the > > LENR reaction: > > > > > http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane > > > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > Thanks for posting this. It confirms what we have been talking about in > related threads about the connection between intense THz and the SPP as the > active modality. > > > > In the HotCat - it appears that Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of > how to get coherent radiation in this spectrum (where lasers are simply not > available) by using a monochromatic emitter of FIR (far infrared), and then > merely applying resistance heat to that emitter. Once the emitter comes up > to temperature, the energy needed to maintain it drops by a large factor - > thus providing control. That temperature is near the runaway temp- so added > control is needed. > > > > Maybe I am giving Rossi more credit than he is due. >
