How do we make it stronger? Vibrate a Bose condensate. In my language, "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the Electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is Vibrated at a Dimensional Frequency of 1.094 megahertz meters". ***Frank, on another thread http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg89493.html
I proposed a 1dimensional BEC. I assumed that the BEC was vibrating. If your theory were condensed down to 1Dimensional physics, it could be mathematically and experimentally elegant. On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:07 AM, <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote: > Thank you Fran. Theories such as Storm's theory of cracks and Widdom > Larson's theory are based on conventional thinking applied under an extreme > condition. These theories consider only the static Coulombic force and the > static strong nuclear force. Even mills with his exotic hydrions considers > only the static forces. As in the battle between Kann and Kirk; Kirk > defeated Kann by his three dimensional thinking. There is another force at > work in the nucleus. They cannot account for the lack of high energy > emissions. > > I am an electric engineer. The only thing I have ever done with the > static electric field is to rub a balloon on my head and stick to to the > wall. I have, however, worked extensively with the dynamic magnetic > component of the electrical field. This is second nature for an electrical > engineer. There is a dynamic magnetic component of the nuclear force. > Its called the spin orbit force. Like the electro-magnetic force; it is > not conserved and can increase without bound. It tends to flip nucleons > and induce a beta decay. How do we make it stronger? Vibrate a Bose > condensate. In my language, "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the > Electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is Vibrated at a Dimensional > Frequency of 1.094 megahertz meters". > > The motion constants are related to motion. Motion is carried by the > magnetic components of the static force fields. Why that speed? When the > velocity of nuclear cluster equals the velocity of sound in the nucleus and > impedance matched condition emerges. This is the condition of the quantum > jump. The quantum condition of the atom emerged from an analysis of this > speed. An extrapolation produced low level nuclear reactions. I believe > that is a big story and that it goes way beyond cold fusion. It has > produced the quantum condition as a subset of the Newtonian mechanics and > it shows how to classically control all of the natural forces. > > The solutions are simple and require only the simple harmonic motion of > advanced high school physics. > > Frank > > > Frank Znidarsic > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 12:17 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > Frank.. > > Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of > antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] > > > > I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the > back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the > claims of Eugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the > environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk > magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I > think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational > effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will > soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved...like > we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently > these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor > placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down > the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as > opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas > becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present > additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or > catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector > and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial > bias. Fran > > > > > > *From:* fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com<fznidar...@aol.com?>] > > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation > for LENR > > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion > > theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity > 1,094,000 > > meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear > > Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. > > > > > > > > > > What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound > in the nucleus. > > > > > > What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the > electronic structure. > > > > Your get: > > > > The energy levels of all of the atoms. > > The intensity of spectral emission. > > The enegy and the frequency of the photon > > The S,P,D, and F orbits. > > A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. > > The deBroglie wave. > > > > extrapolate and get: > > > > The technology of antigravity > > and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. > > > > > > > > Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" > > > > > > > > Frank Znidarsic > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fznidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > "a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" > > > Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the > Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity > 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of > the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. > > > http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 > > Frank Znidarsic > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am > Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR > > > *From:* Ron Kita > > I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but > I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell > citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the > LENR reaction: > > > http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane > > > Hi Ron, > > Thanks for posting this. It confirms what we have been talking about in > related threads about the connection between intense THz and the SPP as the > active modality. > > In the HotCat - it appears that Rossi has elegantly solved the problem > of how to get coherent radiation in this spectrum (where lasers are simply > not available) by using a monochromatic emitter of FIR (far infrared), and > then merely applying resistance heat to that emitter. Once the emitter > comes up to temperature, the energy needed to maintain it drops by a large > factor - thus providing control. That temperature is near the runaway temp- > so added control is needed. > > Maybe I am giving Rossi more credit than he is due. >
