Thank you Fran. Theories such as Storm's theory of cracks and Widdom Larson's theory are based on conventional thinking applied under an extreme condition. These theories consider only the static Coulombic force and the static strong nuclear force. Even mills with his exotic hydrions considers only the static forces. As in the battle between Kann and Kirk; Kirk defeated Kann by his three dimensional thinking. There is another force at work in the nucleus. They cannot account for the lack of high energy emissions.
I am an electric engineer. The only thing I have ever done with the static electric field is to rub a balloon on my head and stick to to the wall. I have, however, worked extensively with the dynamic magnetic component of the electrical field. This is second nature for an electrical engineer. There is a dynamic magnetic component of the nuclear force. Its called the spin orbit force. Like the electro-magnetic force; it is not conserved and can increase without bound. It tends to flip nucleons and induce a beta decay. How do we make it stronger? Vibrate a Bose condensate. In my language, "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the Electromagnetic in a Bose condensate that is Vibrated at a Dimensional Frequency of 1.094 megahertz meters". The motion constants are related to motion. Motion is carried by the magnetic components of the static force fields. Why that speed? When the velocity of nuclear cluster equals the velocity of sound in the nucleus and impedance matched condition emerges. This is the condition of the quantum jump. The quantum condition of the atom emerged from an analysis of this speed. An extrapolation produced low level nuclear reactions. I believe that is a big story and that it goes way beyond cold fusion. It has produced the quantum condition as a subset of the Newtonian mechanics and it shows how to classically control all of the natural forces. The solutions are simple and require only the simple harmonic motion of advanced high school physics. Frank Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 12:17 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR Frank.. Re your extrapolation [snip] extrapolate and get:The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. [/snip] I not only agree but I think it is antigravity that will finally break the back of skepticism regarding LENR.. Like you I followed with interest the claims ofEugene Podkletnov and played with meisner effect in the environmental lab at work trying to use some liquid nitrogen and a bulk magnetic eraser to tickle the effect out of my very amateur experiment.. I think the effect in LENR will require motion to detect the gravitational effect but once a compact mobile method of LENR becomes available it will soon be discovered there are also anomalous inertial effects involved…like we see radioactive decay rate anomalies it is a temporal effect, presently these reactors are large and stationary but I predict a portable reactor placed running on one side of a balance beam will significantly slow down the reaction to changes in weight on the opposite arm of the balance as opposed to changes in weight when the reactor is turned off. The gas becomes relativistic due to the casimir geometry and it will present additional opposition beyond 3d to the normal inertia of the bulk powder or catalyst. IMHO this opposition will be 90 degrees from any spatial vector and simply slow the normal inertia like a flywheel but without a spatial bias. Fran From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now factor in the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. What is the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second? Its the velocity of sound in the nucleus. What happens when you set this velocity = the velocity of light in the electronic structure. Your get: The energy levels of all of the atoms. The intensity of spectral emission. The enegy and the frequency of the photon The S,P,D, and F orbits. A possible unification of quantum physics and Spec Rel. The deBroglie wave. extrapolate and get: The technology of antigravity and the technology of low energy nuclear reactions. Its all in my very cheep paperback,"Energy, Cold Fusion, and Antigravity" Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: fznidarsic <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:53 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR "a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz" Forget about the cracks, hydrinos, and the like. My Constants of the Motion theory told of this in 1998, Now add the size and get the velocity 1,094,000 meters per second. I presented the theory at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society in 2000. That's a long time ago. http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/787504 Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, Jan 28, 2014 10:44 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:NASA Bushnell quote on 5-30 THz stimulation for LENR From: Ron Kita I can only read about 5% of Vortex LENR posts but I saw this Feb 2013 website with a quote on Dennis Bushnell citing that a rf stimulation of 5-30 THz is needed to initate the LENR reaction: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/149090-nasas-cold-fusion-tech-could-put-a-nuclear-reactor-in-every-home-car-and-plane Hi Ron, Thanks for posting this. It confirms what we have been talking about in related threads about the connection between intense THz and the SPP as the active modality. In the HotCat – it appears that Rossi has elegantly solved the problem of how to get coherent radiation in this spectrum (where lasers are simply not available) by using a monochromatic emitter of FIR (far infrared), and then merely applying resistance heat to that emitter. Once the emitter comes up to temperature, the energy needed to maintain it drops by a large factor – thus providing control. That temperature is near the runaway temp- so added control is needed. Maybe I am giving Rossi more credit than he is due.
