They dont explicitly say anything about COP, but it a reasonable
interpretation of the display that is shown at 1:17:32. Energy in top
left, COP in the middle. The figures could of course refer to something
else, but I think that if I was doing the experiment then this would be
the figure I would be interested in and would have on my display when
doing internal tests.
The fact that they don't draw attention to COP in the demo is perhaps an
indication that they realise that it is not wonderful. Also the fact
that they do not draw attention to it I think increases the likelyhood
in my mind that the 2.16 figure is is what they are currently thinking
is the real figure. Its sufficiently low that it would be necessary to
double check possible artefacts, such as heat released during chemical
decomposition of the substrate.
This all feels oddly familiar
Nigel
On 04/02/2014 15:23, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:*Nigel Dyer
The energy gain of about two is based on an energy in of 850J which
gives the appearance of having been typed in rather than measured,
I must have missed something Nigel.
Are saying the COP of this demo is about 2 ?
