What accounts for the Heat/Helium correlation in this reaction mechanism? Is it discounted?
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > For the various Spin Doctors on Vortex - > > Here is a magnon-ymous tribute to John Bockris, who passed away last > summer. > Bockris authored over 700 papers and 24 books. This blip is courtesy of > Brian Ahern who has been developing a nanomagnetism hypothesis for > non-nuclear gain in LENR which involves magnons, spin coupling and Curie > point recycling. > > It does not necessarily replace fusion, but may be another (one of many) > sources of thermal gain. In fact there is the possibility that given the > strangeness of QM - the way that one gets to a reactionless version of > helium fusion is to already have given up the 24 MeV with spin coupling !!! > > This finding below should be a strong indication that even Pd-D has a > robust > spin coupling mechanism, which is unrelated to fusion - but which is > definitely thermally gainful and could precede fusion. > > I mean to say "probably unrelated to fusion" since in the following - there > was NO ENERGY applied, simply a magnetic field. Most proponents of Pd-D > realize that helium cannot arise without some energy input, but the point > is > that even here, there could be another distinct route to thermal gain. > > From Bockris and Sundaresan 1994 > > 2.3. Magnetic Stimulation > > After the cathode had been charged with deuterium for 48 hours at a current > of 80 mA, the cell was placed in the field of a permanent magnet of 200 > Gauss strength. The cell electrolyte temperature rose to 5 ° C (Fig.10.) > after 230 seconds, After 576 seconds, the magnet was replaced by two, one > inch Neodymium magnets with a 800 Gauss field placed as described earlier. > The temperature immediately started increasing and reached 13.5 ° C in > about > 15 minutes and remained constant. The temperature returned to 3.5 ° C when > the magnet was removed. >
