this presentation at ICCF18 have a part on their work about identifiying crystallography condition https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/36833
they made a less detailed presentation for ICCF15 anyone with an honest brain understand that if you cannot replicate an experiment for sure, it can be because of uncontrolled parameters... I've always been shocked, amazed, fascinated, by the abilities of physicist and their minions like scienceapologist, to ignore that evidence... even when you explain that evidence, it seems out of their capacity to integrate that new idea... maybe I'm too low in life scale, just an engineer who make so many experiment and planned success, fail miserably, who made so many deterministic programs behave like alien stubborn life... I know perfect reproduction is not human. But I'm not a perfect nuclear physicist who saved the freedom with A bomb... that must be the explanation. ;-) I imagine no A-Bomb ever failed miserably ? 2014-03-09 19:34 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> There have been hundreds if not thousands of working cells. Where are >> they? >> > > Most of the ones I know of were used up in destructive testing. As Mike > Melich put it, "what we do to these cathodes would make the angels weep." > > F&P sent all of theirs back to Johnson Matthey, and they did not know what > happened to them after that. (That was part of the agreement.) > > The people at the ENEA are compiling an extensive database of the material > characteristics of cathodes they make. I assume they have to use > destructive testing in the end. > > Ohmori had a box full of them. I have no idea what happened to them. > > There are about a thousand used cathodes at the U. Missouri SKINR lab. I > think that is how many they said. Many produced heat. I do not know much > about what they are doing with them. A lot of them fall apart, so they > examine them to figure out why. > > The follow-up analysis of the cathode is as important as the experiment > itself. > > - Jed > >
