In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 15 May 2014 15:26:56 -0700: Hi Jones,
What do you make of the following message from the archives? http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg90378.html >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] > >>Well, there is also a possible analogy of the QM depletion zone, which >might arise in a combined type of Millsean-LENR situation, such that the >"makeup" nuclear reaction only occurs in a severely depleted zone (due to >orbital redundancy being brought back up to equilibrium by time-reversed >fusion reaction.) > >This sounds like Ed's theory. ;) > > >...Except... there is a rather huge fundamental difference between: > >a) fusion-first followed by thousands of stepwise decreases in energy >release, delayed over an extended time frame. > >and > >b) millions of small energy releases happening first - from a non-nuclear >mechanism, followed by a new type of QM tunneling fusion reaction which can >only happen in a severely depleted spatial zone. > >My apologies to Ed if he has changed his view to reconcile the two. > >Jones > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
