I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying the report for the sake of isotopic analysis otherwise?
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > A few weeks ago, Jed Rothwell said that professors have a very casual > relationship with deadlines. A better round of adjectives would be > thoughtless, supercilious, aloof. > > There is not much doubt in my mind that this report will eventually be > positive. If it had been a blowout, they'd have published loudly and > quickly. > > And in this interim period after April when the report was DUE, the delays > (now very extended delays) are more likely due to the fact that these > scientists, their family & friends are using this information selfishly. > Cyclone Power (CYPW) could easily be bankrupt by the time these guys > finally get off their butts. But these professors are very likely all > giving their friends the heads up that LENR is real, how to invest > accordingly, and taking this stolen time to move their own money > advantageously. > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> E-Cat world reporting another delay from the TIP testers... "early autumn" >> "Soon we will probably know a little bit more. The group of scientists >> from >> Uppsala and KTH has expanded with more scientists from other countries and >> the second independent test is about to get published early autumn. The >> test >> has been going on for months on neutral premises in Lugano, >> Switzerland..." >> >> ... sounding like a scratched vinyl record >> >> >
