Here's the first few lines of your post. Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+%5BVo%5D%3ASay+it+ain%27t+so%2C+Joe%22>
Foks0904 . <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22Foks0904+.%22> Sat, 21 Jun 2014 07:53:25 -0700 <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20140621> I'm a little disappointed, but as Daniel and others have suggested, at the very least, this seems to suggest that nuclear levels of excess heat have been measured yet again. Why bother with delaying the report for the sake of isotopic analysis otherwise? On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > A few weeks ago, Jed Rothwell said that professors have a very casual > relationship with deadlines.
