Kevin, maybe you're right, who knows, but for the most part that suggestion is pure innuendo. It's like making the argument that Gamberle has some shadowy partner who wants to steal DGT's technology, and so he broke his NDA and issued a fraudulent statement to make DGT look bad. Possibly, but that's quite the story with very little evidence to back it up.
It's also similar in a way to pathological skeptics who immediately rush to the most negative conclusion and suggest all kinds of nefarious behavior behind the scenes (i.e. Levi, Essen, Hoistad, et al, are all "in on the scam", etc.), even though there's no good reason to think so, beyond the fact it might satisfy one's own biases. Obviously we're all theory crafting to an extent, but I'd put your speculation pretty low on the probability scale. On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why bother with delaying the report for the sake of isotopic analysis >> otherwise? >> > ***For exactly the reason I just detailed: they are using this > information selfishly. > >
