Thanks. Good interview.
The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that it gets few viewers - is lack of graphics. Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among volunteers) has the resources for a graphics artist these days? I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without the sound, like this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD4hj2PmkoY They are supposedly a for-profit company who might agree - for a little joint PR. Anyway - If anything needs to be cleared up it is the “hydroton”. Everything in the Storms theory pretty much depends on this hybrid concept. It is a hypothetical “chemical structure” without any precedence in chemistry or physics. To me, it looks like a strained attempt to shoehorn Hagelstein’s ideas about lack of gammas into fractofusion, together with something vaguely related to Mills. Ed has expressed before that he does not like his concept being referred to as fractofusion…. but he has this love/hate thing with trying to draw the line between hot and cold fusion is a peculiar way that probably cannot be valid. My response is that if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck …. Well, anyway - we ought to start a new thread on the hydroton when enough readers have gotten hold of the book. Jones From: Foks0904 For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. We discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape generally -- and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for listening: http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/
