I have been in correspondence over the past with Ed Storms over BEC theories. He has very low regard for them. Primarily, he thinks they can't happen at anything close to the temperatures that LENR operates. And to be candid, when I see that there is evidence that LENR effects increase as the temperature increases... that leads me to suspect that BECs aren't the right answer. But if a plasma is generated, then all bets are off because plasma physics is so far estranged from condensed matter physics.
If Miley measured zero resistance, it begs the question of how far back his OhmMeter goes. Because if there was NEGATIVE resistance, it would measure as zero resistance. There are no "negative resistance" meters on the market. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_resistance It would mean that Miley generated a circuit with tunneling diodes or Gunn diodes and measured it in parallel with a known zero-resistance circuit. I doubt he did that. On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Miley has measures zero resistance in the Nano cavity that holds the > hydrogen, So the hydrogen is superconducting. That has to be a BEC. How > does this experimental finding impact Ed Storms theory? Has Ed included > this dot in his collection? > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Maybe instead of metallic 1D hydrogen, it's a Vibrational 1D Luttinger >> Liquid BEC forming. A V1DLLBEC. >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a >>> lattice defect... metallic 1D hydrogen... >>> >>> Rydberg states is rather talking of excitation of the electrons.. >>> maybe is rydberg state of atoms in a coherent 1D chain of metallic >>> hydrogen... >>> >>> maybe is is a 1D rydberg matter... need more data >>> >>> >>> 2014-07-20 21:22 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka >>>> matter)? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks. Good interview. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that >>>>> it gets few viewers - is lack of graphics. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among >>>>> volunteers) has the resources for a graphics artist these days? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without the >>>>> sound, like this one >>>>> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD4hj2PmkoY >>>>> >>>>> They are supposedly a for-profit company who might agree - for a >>>>> little joint PR. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Anyway - If anything needs to be cleared up it is the “hydroton”. >>>>> Everything in the Storms theory pretty much depends on this hybrid >>>>> concept. >>>>> It is a hypothetical “chemical structure” without any precedence in >>>>> chemistry or physics. To me, it looks like a strained attempt to shoehorn >>>>> Hagelstein’s ideas about lack of gammas into fractofusion, together with >>>>> something vaguely related to Mills. Ed has expressed before that he does >>>>> not like his concept being referred to as fractofusion…. but he has this >>>>> love/hate thing with trying to draw the line between hot and cold fusion >>>>> is >>>>> a peculiar way that probably cannot be valid. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My response is that if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck …. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, anyway - we ought to start a new thread on the hydroton when >>>>> enough readers have gotten hold of the book. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jones >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Foks0904 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. >>>>> We discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape >>>>> generally >>>>> -- and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for listening: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
