Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka matter)?
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. Good interview. > > > > The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that it > gets few viewers - is lack of graphics. > > > > Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among volunteers) > has the resources for a graphics artist these days? > > > > I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without the > sound, like this one > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD4hj2PmkoY > > They are supposedly a for-profit company who might agree - for a little > joint PR. > > > > Anyway - If anything needs to be cleared up it is the “hydroton”. > Everything in the Storms theory pretty much depends on this hybrid concept. > It is a hypothetical “chemical structure” without any precedence in > chemistry or physics. To me, it looks like a strained attempt to shoehorn > Hagelstein’s ideas about lack of gammas into fractofusion, together with > something vaguely related to Mills. Ed has expressed before that he does > not like his concept being referred to as fractofusion…. but he has this > love/hate thing with trying to draw the line between hot and cold fusion is > a peculiar way that probably cannot be valid. > > > > My response is that if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck …. > > > > Well, anyway - we ought to start a new thread on the hydroton when enough > readers have gotten hold of the book. > > > > Jones > > > > *From:* Foks0904 > > > > For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. We > discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape generally -- > and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for listening: > > > > http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/ >
