Maybe instead of metallic 1D hydrogen, it's a Vibrational 1D Luttinger Liquid BEC forming. A V1DLLBEC.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a > lattice defect... metallic 1D hydrogen... > > Rydberg states is rather talking of excitation of the electrons.. > maybe is rydberg state of atoms in a coherent 1D chain of metallic > hydrogen... > > maybe is is a 1D rydberg matter... need more data > > > 2014-07-20 21:22 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: > > Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka matter)? >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks. Good interview. >>> >>> >>> >>> The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure that it >>> gets few viewers - is lack of graphics. >>> >>> >>> >>> Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among volunteers) >>> has the resources for a graphics artist these days? >>> >>> >>> >>> I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without the >>> sound, like this one >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD4hj2PmkoY >>> >>> They are supposedly a for-profit company who might agree - for a little >>> joint PR. >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyway - If anything needs to be cleared up it is the “hydroton”. >>> Everything in the Storms theory pretty much depends on this hybrid concept. >>> It is a hypothetical “chemical structure” without any precedence in >>> chemistry or physics. To me, it looks like a strained attempt to shoehorn >>> Hagelstein’s ideas about lack of gammas into fractofusion, together with >>> something vaguely related to Mills. Ed has expressed before that he does >>> not like his concept being referred to as fractofusion…. but he has this >>> love/hate thing with trying to draw the line between hot and cold fusion is >>> a peculiar way that probably cannot be valid. >>> >>> >>> >>> My response is that if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck …. >>> >>> >>> >>> Well, anyway - we ought to start a new thread on the hydroton when >>> enough readers have gotten hold of the book. >>> >>> >>> >>> Jones >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Foks0904 >>> >>> >>> >>> For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion theory. We >>> discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory landscape generally -- >>> and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks for listening: >>> >>> >>> >>> http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/ >>> >> >> >
