See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_conduction
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil: > > My responses are embedded within your email designated by 3 asterisks > ***. > > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote In > the field of topological materials, superconductivity is produced by > confinement of electrons to a tight path. > ***such a thing sound eminently plausible in the field of LENR. > > > > > >> Electrons seem to jump over defec* >> > ***Ed storms says in this interview that they are bound by some chemical > bind. I'm not aware of such a chemical bond. Are you? How would such a > binded group of atoms jump over a defect? In my view, they wouldn't. They > would split, forming 2 chemical strings that could, as Storms put it, > "resonate against each other". A collision of 2 trains of atoms could > overcome the Coulomb barrier and generate a fusion event. > > >> >> >> >> > that would usually cause them to demonstrate resistance. >> > ***Which leads me to ask about negative resistance... > > > > > > >> Reconsidering, >> > ***Wait.... WTF? What causes you to reconsider? Are you reconsidering > your own position? Storms's position? My theory? What are you > reconsidering? > > > >> One dimensional topology does not require a BEC to form to produce zero >> resistance. >> > ***Atain, wait... WTF??? What are you saying, that the OVSErVED behavior > of one-diimensional topologies of Luttinger Liquids cannot lead to 1D BECs > forming at higher temperatures and zero resistance? Because, if that is > the case, you are micrometers away from OBSERVEd effects and KiloMeters > away from theoretical effects. > > > > > > >> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I have been in correspondence over the past with Ed Storms over BEC >>> theories. He has very low regard for them. Primarily, he thinks they >>> can't happen at anything close to the temperatures that LENR operates. And >>> to be candid, when I see that there is evidence that LENR effects increase >>> as the temperature increases... that leads me to suspect that BECs aren't >>> the right answer. But if a plasma is generated, then all bets are off >>> because plasma physics is so far estranged from condensed matter physics. >>> >>> If Miley measured zero resistance, it begs the question of how far back >>> his OhmMeter goes. Because if there was NEGATIVE resistance, it would >>> measure as zero resistance. There are no "negative resistance" meters on >>> the market. >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_resistance >>> It would mean that Miley generated a circuit with tunneling diodes or >>> Gunn diodes and measured it in parallel with a known zero-resistance >>> circuit. I doubt he did that. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Miley has measures zero resistance in the Nano cavity that holds the >>>> hydrogen, So the hydrogen is superconducting. That has to be a BEC. How >>>> does this experimental finding impact Ed Storms theory? Has Ed included >>>> this dot in his collection? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe instead of metallic 1D hydrogen, it's a Vibrational 1D >>>>> Luttinger Liquid BEC forming. A V1DLLBEC. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> maybe some connexions, but Hydroton is a 1D object, constrained in a >>>>>> lattice defect... metallic 1D hydrogen... >>>>>> >>>>>> Rydberg states is rather talking of excitation of the electrons.. >>>>>> maybe is rydberg state of atoms in a coherent 1D chain of metallic >>>>>> hydrogen... >>>>>> >>>>>> maybe is is a 1D rydberg matter... need more data >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-07-20 21:22 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is the hydroton different from Rydberg hydrogen crystals(aka >>>>>>> matter)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks. Good interview. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The main complaint from the non-specialists - which will insure >>>>>>>> that it gets few viewers - is lack of graphics. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Which is unrealistic of course, since who (especially among >>>>>>>> volunteers) has the resources for a graphics artist these days? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was going to suggest looping parts of an existing video, without >>>>>>>> the sound, like this one >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VD4hj2PmkoY >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They are supposedly a for-profit company who might agree - for a >>>>>>>> little joint PR. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyway - If anything needs to be cleared up it is the “hydroton”. >>>>>>>> Everything in the Storms theory pretty much depends on this hybrid >>>>>>>> concept. >>>>>>>> It is a hypothetical “chemical structure” without any precedence in >>>>>>>> chemistry or physics. To me, it looks like a strained attempt to >>>>>>>> shoehorn >>>>>>>> Hagelstein’s ideas about lack of gammas into fractofusion, together >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> something vaguely related to Mills. Ed has expressed before that he >>>>>>>> does >>>>>>>> not like his concept being referred to as fractofusion…. but he has >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> love/hate thing with trying to draw the line between hot and cold >>>>>>>> fusion is >>>>>>>> a peculiar way that probably cannot be valid. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My response is that if walks like a duck and quacks like a duck …. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Well, anyway - we ought to start a new thread on the hydroton when >>>>>>>> enough readers have gotten hold of the book. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jones >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Foks0904 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For anyone who has 50 minutes and an interest in cold fusion >>>>>>>> theory. We discuss both Ed's theory specifically and the theory >>>>>>>> landscape >>>>>>>> generally -- and get into a number of other topics in between. Thanks >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> listening: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://coldfusionnow.org/interview-with-dr-edmund-storms-on-lenr-theory/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
