The simplest answer to these question is YES. A bit longer one; - as you know, DGT works by making hydrogen more reactive and Ni more receptive, if you read their ICCF-17 paper you will see they are increasing the mobility of the surfaces of Ni crystals- we still have to see what exactly can play the role of a nano-antenna, is there unity in diversity or even greater diversity in diversity- details have to be discovered, what i am convinced is- it is not about simple cracks, however the very surace of cracks can be ACTIVE
- yes, I think at LENR+ active sites are created very dynamically, we ahve to learn the Know Why and how to accelearte in a controlled way the process (let me repeat I am using NAE in other sense- the NAEnvironment is the complete cell- F& P, or Piantelli etc , the entire E-cat or Hyperion) - i still don't know the details regarding the death, birth and activity of the active sites- it is a captivating story Whatever they are and however they work I also think as AXIL that nanoplasmonics and BEC play a decisive role. We have to study the complete scenario. peter . On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter, thank you for the kind words. > > Are you proposing a different mechanism than Axil's Nano antenna NAE to > bootstrap the LENR BEC reaction? Your NAE is dynamically created? Do you > propose nano structures also for your NAE? If you are, you also have to > explain how that surface structure (whatever it is) will survive the temps > or be dynamically recreated in quantities sufficient to sustain KW levels > of heat. Seems like a lot of NAE being created at these heat levels. > > > > Jojo > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > *To:* VORTEX <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 23, 2014 3:42 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: \"The Explanation of Low > Energy Nuclear Reaction\" > > Very inspiring and well motivated what you say here, Jojo. > It leads, in my opinion to a crucial problem, question: > > What is the essential difference between the classic LENR > with Watts of heat release and the new LENR+ a la Rossi and DGT > with enhanced heat release at the kWatts level? > > My answer was, from the start that it is the mechanism of genesis > of active sites (NAE), Classic LENR works mainly with pre-formed > active sites, limited in number/density while LENR+ is based on a continous > generation of new active sites- it is a dynamic equilibrium between the > active sites that are destroyed by the high temperature and the new ones > that > appear, the trick is to have many of these doing their task - a sequence > of processes and reactions. You show the destructive side of elevated > temperatures, the constructive side must be added and this is the clue of > the LENR+ progress. > The critical Debye temperature is one at which the dynamics of the atoms > at the surface of the metal, changes. > > I have predicted this decisive role of surface dynamics long ago see > please: > http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:26035858 > > Axil describes a part of the details- the coming LENR_ events will reveal > a lot, including the role of the dynamic equilibrium of the active sites- > with details that can help us to go from principles to theories. > > Peter > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In all this talk about the NAE being a Nanowire, a nanotip, a >> nanoantenna, a nanomesh, a nanospike, a nano coating on a nano particle, a >> nano-this and a nano-that; people seems to be forgeting the fact that >> whatever nano structure the NAE is, it will not survive the temperatures >> we've seen being demonstrated; especially with Rossi's hotcat. >> >> Is it not obvious to anyone that whatever whatever the NAE is, it >> couldn't possibly be a nanostructure of Nickel. Nickel will be a >> homogenous blob of partly molten metal at the temperatures we are talking >> about. And it is known, that it will sinter and reshape itself even at >> temperatures significantly below its melting temp. In other words, >> GOODBYE NAE. At best, it is a one-use NAE. An NAE that is a nanostructure >> Nickel appears to be highly unlikely and improbable. >> >> That is why, I'm with Ed on this. People come up with theories that >> conveniently ignore the chemical environment. In this case, the physical >> melting or sintering point of Nickel. >> >> Axil's theory while sounding erudite and well-researched, has a big hole >> in the middle of it. Big enough to drive a Mack truck thru. Unless Axil >> can explain how his Nano antenna NAE can survive the temps, It is my >> opinion that his theory is dead. >> >> I broke my self-imposed exile just to say this. It seems that there >> are many theories being bandied around that simply breaks very important >> principles. Whatever you think of Ed's book, he makes a very important >> point, we should not simply ignore the chemical environment, or physical >> properties of metals, or thermodynamic principles, etc if they do not fit >> our theories. >> >> >> Jojo >> >> >> > > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
