This is way a LENR system will work for awhile and then died a slow death. A BEC leeps a reactor going for months without damage to the nano strutures.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil -- this sounds a bit similar to Widom-Larsen's magic gamma shield. > Maybe there is evidence for energy distribution in a BEC polariton system > -- but these are observed only outside LENR systems, in very selective > environments, and last I checked all NiH generating systems don't require > the existence of a cold plasma either. In those systems no BEC would form, > and a truck load of gammas would result. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The BEC buffers the release of energy by widely spreading it out over >> many NAE. The is something called quantum mechanical blockade that makes >> sure no one NAE get more energy than the others. >> >> When there is no BEC formed, a gamma is produced by the sole NAE and the >> NAE is destroyed. A LENR system that produces gamma is eating itself up and >> will soon fail. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Axil -- OK, but how is the fusion reaction initiated in this model? The >>> magnetic nano-antennae traps bring the hydrogen to the NAE (which is what >>> exactly?) and then what happens? Basically Kim's theory? Where else, >>> experimentally, has a BCE exhibited the tendency to initiate fusion? >>> >>> Why would the BEC "protect [nano-wire] from destruction"? BEC's >>> themselves are not known to exist at the temperatures we are >>> positing. Therefore how can they protect anything if they themselves should >>> not maintain an existence at much higher temperatures? I know the claims >>> for creation of "room temperature" BEC (Michigan group I think) -- none of >>> which show BEC can exist at particularly high temperatures in a chaotic >>> environment, form in copious amounts, or initiate any kind of fusion >>> reaction. This seems like another way of stating Hagelstein's view, only he >>> doesn't posit the necessity for a BEC or plasmons, whereby he explains >>> energy dissipation through a quantum coherent sharing process across the >>> lattice structure & hydrogen clusters via phonons (aka quasi-particles -- >>> same as polaritons). >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> The way power flows from the fusion reaction to the lattice is based on >>>> the formation of a global BEC. The nuclear reaction feeds the BEC power in >>>> small packets, hundreds of thousands of energy packets spread quantum >>>> mechanically over all the members of the global polariton BEC. The nickel >>>> nanowire does not enter into the nuclear reaction. It only projects a >>>> magnetic force that causes the nuclear reaction to take place. The Energy >>>> from the LENR reaction flows back through the magnetic field lines to the >>>> soliton which is the BEC ensemble member at the tip of the nickel nanowire. >>>> >>>> The BEC of polaritons is what protects the nickel nanowire from >>>> destruction. >>>> >>>> Similar energy sharing is seen in the BEC of Rydberg atoms. That BEC is >>>> called a super atom because it act like one huge atom. >>>> >>>> This is also how dark matter polariton clouds form at the centers of >>>> dwarf galaxies to form a polariton BEC of dark matter carried by >>>> interstellar dust as the substrate that is 100000 parsecs in diameter. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the comment Jojo. I think you make a fair point(s). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In all this talk about the NAE being a Nanowire, a nanotip, a >>>>>> nanoantenna, a nanomesh, a nanospike, a nano coating on a nano particle, >>>>>> a >>>>>> nano-this and a nano-that; people seems to be forgeting the fact that >>>>>> whatever nano structure the NAE is, it will not survive the temperatures >>>>>> we've seen being demonstrated; especially with Rossi's hotcat. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it not obvious to anyone that whatever whatever the NAE is, it >>>>>> couldn't possibly be a nanostructure of Nickel. Nickel will be a >>>>>> homogenous blob of partly molten metal at the temperatures we are talking >>>>>> about. And it is known, that it will sinter and reshape itself even at >>>>>> temperatures significantly below its melting temp. In other words, >>>>>> GOODBYE NAE. At best, it is a one-use NAE. An NAE that is a >>>>>> nanostructure >>>>>> Nickel appears to be highly unlikely and improbable. >>>>>> >>>>>> That is why, I'm with Ed on this. People come up with theories that >>>>>> conveniently ignore the chemical environment. In this case, the physical >>>>>> melting or sintering point of Nickel. >>>>>> >>>>>> Axil's theory while sounding erudite and well-researched, has a big >>>>>> hole in the middle of it. Big enough to drive a Mack truck thru. Unless >>>>>> Axil can explain how his Nano antenna NAE can survive the temps, It is my >>>>>> opinion that his theory is dead. >>>>>> >>>>>> I broke my self-imposed exile just to say this. It seems that >>>>>> there are many theories being bandied around that simply breaks very >>>>>> important principles. Whatever you think of Ed's book, he makes a very >>>>>> important point, we should not simply ignore the chemical environment, or >>>>>> physical properties of metals, or thermodynamic principles, etc if they >>>>>> do >>>>>> not fit our theories. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jojo >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
