Axil -- this sounds a bit similar to Widom-Larsen's magic gamma shield. Maybe there is evidence for energy distribution in a BEC polariton system -- but these are observed only outside LENR systems, in very selective environments, and last I checked all NiH generating systems don't require the existence of a cold plasma either. In those systems no BEC would form, and a truck load of gammas would result.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The BEC buffers the release of energy by widely spreading it out over many > NAE. The is something called quantum mechanical blockade that makes sure no > one NAE get more energy than the others. > > When there is no BEC formed, a gamma is produced by the sole NAE and the > NAE is destroyed. A LENR system that produces gamma is eating itself up and > will soon fail. > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Axil -- OK, but how is the fusion reaction initiated in this model? The >> magnetic nano-antennae traps bring the hydrogen to the NAE (which is what >> exactly?) and then what happens? Basically Kim's theory? Where else, >> experimentally, has a BCE exhibited the tendency to initiate fusion? >> >> Why would the BEC "protect [nano-wire] from destruction"? BEC's >> themselves are not known to exist at the temperatures we are >> positing. Therefore how can they protect anything if they themselves should >> not maintain an existence at much higher temperatures? I know the claims >> for creation of "room temperature" BEC (Michigan group I think) -- none of >> which show BEC can exist at particularly high temperatures in a chaotic >> environment, form in copious amounts, or initiate any kind of fusion >> reaction. This seems like another way of stating Hagelstein's view, only he >> doesn't posit the necessity for a BEC or plasmons, whereby he explains >> energy dissipation through a quantum coherent sharing process across the >> lattice structure & hydrogen clusters via phonons (aka quasi-particles -- >> same as polaritons). >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The way power flows from the fusion reaction to the lattice is based on >>> the formation of a global BEC. The nuclear reaction feeds the BEC power in >>> small packets, hundreds of thousands of energy packets spread quantum >>> mechanically over all the members of the global polariton BEC. The nickel >>> nanowire does not enter into the nuclear reaction. It only projects a >>> magnetic force that causes the nuclear reaction to take place. The Energy >>> from the LENR reaction flows back through the magnetic field lines to the >>> soliton which is the BEC ensemble member at the tip of the nickel nanowire. >>> >>> The BEC of polaritons is what protects the nickel nanowire from >>> destruction. >>> >>> Similar energy sharing is seen in the BEC of Rydberg atoms. That BEC is >>> called a super atom because it act like one huge atom. >>> >>> This is also how dark matter polariton clouds form at the centers of >>> dwarf galaxies to form a polariton BEC of dark matter carried by >>> interstellar dust as the substrate that is 100000 parsecs in diameter. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the comment Jojo. I think you make a fair point(s). >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In all this talk about the NAE being a Nanowire, a nanotip, a >>>>> nanoantenna, a nanomesh, a nanospike, a nano coating on a nano particle, >>>>> a >>>>> nano-this and a nano-that; people seems to be forgeting the fact that >>>>> whatever nano structure the NAE is, it will not survive the temperatures >>>>> we've seen being demonstrated; especially with Rossi's hotcat. >>>>> >>>>> Is it not obvious to anyone that whatever whatever the NAE is, it >>>>> couldn't possibly be a nanostructure of Nickel. Nickel will be a >>>>> homogenous blob of partly molten metal at the temperatures we are talking >>>>> about. And it is known, that it will sinter and reshape itself even at >>>>> temperatures significantly below its melting temp. In other words, >>>>> GOODBYE NAE. At best, it is a one-use NAE. An NAE that is a >>>>> nanostructure >>>>> Nickel appears to be highly unlikely and improbable. >>>>> >>>>> That is why, I'm with Ed on this. People come up with theories that >>>>> conveniently ignore the chemical environment. In this case, the physical >>>>> melting or sintering point of Nickel. >>>>> >>>>> Axil's theory while sounding erudite and well-researched, has a big >>>>> hole in the middle of it. Big enough to drive a Mack truck thru. Unless >>>>> Axil can explain how his Nano antenna NAE can survive the temps, It is my >>>>> opinion that his theory is dead. >>>>> >>>>> I broke my self-imposed exile just to say this. It seems that there >>>>> are many theories being bandied around that simply breaks very important >>>>> principles. Whatever you think of Ed's book, he makes a very important >>>>> point, we should not simply ignore the chemical environment, or physical >>>>> properties of metals, or thermodynamic principles, etc if they do not fit >>>>> our theories. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jojo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
