A huge amount of RF radiation should be produced by the NMR active isotopes of chlorine. Chlorine has only non zero nuclear magnetic monuments in its two isotopes.
Mills could capture a large amount of electric power by converting RF to electricity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectenna Like all LENR reactors, the Sun Cell will need to be heavily shielded from transmitting RF interference. Someone needs to invent a Rectenna system that not only capture all RF interference but also shields the reactor from RF interference exiting the reactor. This IP will be a big money maker. Mills won't invent this IP because it would undercut this theory. On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > LENR will always occur in a nanoparticle environment when pumped by an > electric discharge. This is witnessed by many experiments involving > exploding foils comprised of various types of metals. > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> First, the fact that the same output could be obtained with a 5J input is >> completely undocumented - it is just thrown out there and without presented >> demonstration or experimental data - the comment is worthless. >> >> Their calorimetry appears to be flawed. They have apparently modified >> the calorimeter to bring in huge current carrying conductors, and everyone >> knows that what carries current well also transports heat well. The heat >> carried by these conductors needed to be calibrated out of the reaction, >> but this was done in a way that did not account for the heat contained in >> the ejecta of the actual experiment. The result is an overestimation of >> the heat carried out by the conductors and subsequently an overestimation >> of the COP. >> >> I am not saying that his COP is less than 1. I think he may be realizing >> excess heat. I just don't believe his claim for high COP at all. And with >> low COP, you will not be able to convert to electricity with net gain. I >> think he has an advantage in that he has high enthalpy of his output, but >> the COP is low. The prospect of converting MW of light (even if the >> efficiency made sense) is pretty ridiculous. I built a 5.4 kW array for >> solar electric and it had 67 square meters of collection area. Do you >> really think he will be able to collect even 5 kW in a single square meter? >> 100kW would melt the PV cells due to inefficiency. It is about as >> [im]practical as his completely flawed plan to use MHD conversion. >> >> Note also the work of Santilli with similar high current experiments. >> His work was subsequently reproduced by Kadeisvili. Santilli showed that >> in high current discharge, LENR transmutation occurred at a reasonably high >> rate. The transmutation evidence was strong, indicating LENR was occurring >> in this high current discharge. Mills may actually get excess heat, but >> much of it may be coming from LENR. Mills does not want this to be the >> case, because heat produced via LENR would not be covered by his patents. >> So he doesn't look for the transmutation products in his result, or he >> doesn't publish that data. Mills may be correct about the fractional >> quantum states of hydrogen and they may be complicit in LENR. But he would >> lose a lot of his patent value if the heat were proved to actually be >> coming from LENR. >> >> Bob Higgins >> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If I remember correctly, it is about 2/3 to 3/4 of the way on video >>> 1. A guy named Jim??? did the bomb calorimetry and he showed the output >>> graph of the temp rise which he calculated to be around 623+ J. Randy then >>> explain that the input power was around 200+ J because the fuel was >>> enclosed in an aluminum sphere shell so it takes energy to vaporize the >>> aluminum sphere shell also. He then explained that if the fuel is >>> detonated directly, that the input energy is 5J instead of 200+ J. They >>> then explained that in this particular single explosion, the COP was 4+. >>> >>> >
