I've been out of this thread on religion and radiometric dating, but a certain fellow can't take no for an answer.
Regarding Axil's speculation, he still needs to explain how his nanostructure can perform what he speculates it can perform at high temps. I know I keep harping on this sintering, melting of nanostructures stuff, but it is a very strong objection to his theory. He needs to be able to account for this physical property of nanonickel, instead of just brushing it aside as something I am too dumb to understand. Unless he can come up with a reasonable explanation why his nickel nanostructures won't sinter and melt, his theory really is dead, no matter how elegant and esoteric the rest of the theory is. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Steve High To: Vortex Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 11:37 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:a new guest editorial by AXIL Hey guys is there any chance that the discussion on radiometric dating could be moved to another thread? Axil put a lot of work into his Egoout posting which I think is well-written and contains a number of interesting ideas. I would love to see these ideas getting batted around by the learned folk at vortex, but that seems to be getting crowded out by the discussion on radiometrics and religion. I would like to read that too, just on a different thread. The crux of Axil's idea seems to be that nanomagnetic excitation of the nucleus results in the production of virtual mesons that turn into muons that go on to promote proton-proton interactions. I am wondering if these individual steps have received scientific exposition or validation elsewhere, and can all this take place without having to deal with the dreaded gamma ray? On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: We are talking rational history here, right? Google hits for "historicity of Bhagavad Gita" : 3 "historicity of Jesus" : about 214,000 Several times, I have asked people who claim to believe the Bhagavad Gita, "do you really believe these are historical accounts"? Their answer is basically no, it's just something they believe in. They were raised believing it, so they don't rock that boat. On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: Yes, specifically the Bhagava Gita. This a small text about Jesus, in his previous incarnation, talking to Arjuna. It's very likely that Jesus was carpenter. He had a family to feed. Or do you think he stared at a wall until he started preaching? 2014-08-15 13:26 GMT-03:00 Jojo Iznart <[email protected]>: I am turning the other cheek by not reciprocating with an insult. As for your other point, I am not sure what you want to prove to me. Are these passages from the Mahabharata? Jojo -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
