My system does not capture all the sea state energy.  It can attenuate the 
waves but not calm it down enough.  If the PBRs can not be deployed in a rough 
sea state area, I can not deploy them near my wave farms as my wave farm will 
be deployed in areas of strong waves.


Jojo


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: James Bowery 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP picks up another 11 M from investors







  On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote:

    I understand what you mean, but my system scales with area.  It can capture 
sea state and swell state energy, not just swell energy like some wave systems.

    So, if the PBRs require low sea state, I guess it won't be compatible for 
integration into my wave farms.  My wave farms will be deployed where there are 
lots of waves.  I go where the storms are.


  That doesn't make sense.


  If you capture the energy, the sea state is lowered behind the wave energy 
system.


    Is the requirement of low sea state only imposed by the plastic bag 
material strength?  Is there limitation on Algae productivity in the presence 
of vigorous stirring and shaking caused by high sea states?  In other words, 
assuming the bag material is of sufficient strength, what happens if you shake 
the PBRs rather violently?  Will it affect algae growth?  It seems to me it 
won't and would probably improve growth due to more thorough mixing of gases 
and nutrients, am I correct?


  The CAPEX of photobioreactors is proportional to area.  If you make the 
barrier stronger, you increase the cost per area.


  Lack of understanding this fundamental driver of algae cultivation is what 
kills the economy of 90% of the proposed cultivation systems.



Reply via email to