f/h and ddl may be a mistaken observation for muonionic atoms.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote: > > ... There are many different ways to categorize possible explanations, but >> for the moment I'll put them in four categories: >> >> 1. Explanations involving fusion of some kind without the catalysis >> of stable shrunken hydrogen (a.k.a. f/H, hydrinos, DDL hydrogen, etc.). >> ... >> >> I was hoping to set up a disjoint partition over the set of all possible > explanations. There was one group of explanations that, depending on how > you define things, might as a consequence end up in (3), the bucket for > everything that is not fusion or involves f/H or is experimental error, but > which I intended to go into (1), the fusion bucket. I would like to place > in category (1) nucleon transfer reactions and neutron and proton capture > reactions. Depending on what definition of *fusion* you go by, such > reactions might be considered something else, although in more common usage > we usually think of them as fusion. When Rossi hints that no fusion is > involved [1], I suspect he is using a more selective definition of the > term, but my idea was to include such reactions nonetheless in category (1) > (the category I'm predicting will be borne out in time). > > Eric > > [1] http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/08/12/what-the-rossi-effect-is-not/ > >
