Thanks Axil.  Cool Explanation.  Unfortunately, about par for the course in
your theorizings.... I cannot understand it.  I do not see a single
reference to muons nor how much power is required for them to do their
thing.  Perhaps it is implied... heavily implied.   This isn't a
"connecting of the dots", it is a "drawing a detailed picture with dots
that artists think EVERYONE should be able to see".  But not everyone sees
it, and the more abstract the dot construction, the fewer people who see
it.   Once you get to a certain level of abstraction, anonymous email
experts use their puppets to try to get you kicked off the board because
even those anonymous "famous" experts probably don't understand what you're
saying and they're too intimidated to confront you.  Well, anyways, thanks
for the response.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> The SPP's not only focus magnetic photons, it also focuses virtual
> photons.
>
> Virtual photons create the magnetic field that define the rate of nuclear
> decay. Usually, the vacuum produces a fixed average rate of virtual photon
> production. So the rate of radioactive decay is stable.
>
> When the SPP focuses virtual photons into a small volume, the rate of
> radioactive decay increases a lot.
>
> This answers why there is no radioactive byproducts produced in LENR.
>
> The Rate of photon production is increased in the same way through
> focusing, so the chance that a meson is produced by magnetic interaction
> with the proton goes up a lot. The two photon reactions both real and
> virtual are directly proportional.
>
> So if radioactive half-life in reduced though virtual particle production,
> the rate(probability) of meson production is  increased proportionally as
> demonstrated by the same concurrent photon focusing mechanism.
>
> There is always a chance that a meson is created from the vacuum.
>
> Magnetic focusing also increases the  chance of seeing a whopper of a
> virtual energy increase in the proton so meson production goes way up
> too. This increased chance of a large virtual energy contribution per unit
> time also increases the chances for meson creation.
>
>

Reply via email to